Leadership Development Myers Briggs Type Indicator Test Results

Question: Discuss about theLeadership Developmentfor Myers Briggs Type Indicator Test Results. Answer: The following is the test result of the MyersBriggs Type Indicator. Figure 1: MBTI test results. Source: As created by the author. Analysis and Critique of the Test: ENFJ is the short for Extraversion, Intuition, Feeling, and Judgement. It is one of the sixteen personality types proposed by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Around two to five percent of the total population falls under this category. According to Ong (2017), the four traits represent four different thought process of a person. The following is the analysis of the traits from the result: Extravert 16 Percent: Sixteen percent extravert over introversion means one is motivated by the interactions with the other people. It means gaining energy from the social situations is easy for those who are extravert. These people seek external idea while making a decision. This helps them in making a sound decision. According to Furnham and Crump (2015), it also helps between deciding the positive and negative aspects of a situation. It shows a healthy mentality and behavioural aspect as the preference of extraversion is slight in nature and expressing the feelings is clear. It perfectly balances the mental pressure of a person. Being a leader certainly requires characteristics like this. Intuitive 22 Percent: Twenty-two percent intuitions means intuitive power works over sensing for this type of people. It is easier for a person with twenty-two percent preference of intuition over sensing to be more abstract than being concrete. This helps the person to concentrate more on the bigger picture than the mere details. The immediate results are not important to this kind of persons, whereas, future possibilities are something they ponder about. It ensures positivity around that person all the time. According to Cohen, Ornoy and Keren (2013), it helps the person to make things the right way. Following the bigger picture gives the goals a better perspective and makes meeting the targets easier. It also ensures high quality of production. People with this trait focus more on quality than quantity. It reduces damage and errors in their work. Feeling 3 Percent: Three percent feeling over thinking means there are marginal or no preference of feeling over thinking. This means the decisions that are being taken by the person will be based on logic rather than personal feelings. According to Jang and Kim (2014), this will ensure unbiased decision making process followed by the person. Involving feelings while taking a decision often results in creating errors. That compromises the quality of ones work. Thus, having the marginal or no preference of feeling over thinking ensures the best possible outcome will be achieved. The decisions being unbiased in nature help others to decide whom to follow and what to do in special cases. Judgement 9 Percent: This means there is a slight preference of judgement over perception. According to the result, the person has a sense of control which comes through predictability. Knowing the plan before hand gives an advantage over the unseen. According to Lee, Lee and Lee (2014), this triggers the person in planning the activities early. The activities being planned before the actions take place helps the person to think about the options which can be executed in emergency cases. This trait helps people creating a reality where the every question has some answer and it reduces the chances of being surprised by a situation. In Depth Analysis of the Result: According to the result, the personal traits make the person more tolerant, reliable, charismatic, and altruistic. These work as the strength for the person. Along with these positive features there are also some weaknesses that are proposed by the result. According to Myers (2016), these weaknesses are being too much idealistic, over selflessness, and being too sensitive. But the positive trait of being impartial helps the person to take the right decision. This result indicates that the person can make other people feel valued and can see the positive and negative aspects in a situation. He can take the decision required unbiased. The person can clearly express himself. References: Ong, J.C., 2017. Bringing MBTI to closure and mindfulness to life. Furnham, A. and Crump, J., 2015. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Promotion at Work. Psychology, 6(12), p.1510. Cohen, Y., Ornoy, H. and Keren, B., 2013. MBTI personality types of project managers and their success: A field survey. Project Management Journal, 44(3), pp.78-87. Lee, K.B., Lee, T.Y. and Lee, H.C., 2014. The Study of Emotional Experience to MBTI Personality Type in University Students. Journal of Korean Clinical Health Science, 2(3), pp.188-194. Jang, H.J. and Kim, M., 2014. Temperament by MBTI Personality Types, Learning Styles and Learning Strategies in Nursing Students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 14(9), pp.400-410. Myers, S., 2016. Myers?Briggs typology and Jungian individuation. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 61(3), pp.289-308.